Talk:Simple Flaws - Revision history

Peter Knutsen: /* Not too happy with Multi-Flaw value progression */ mentioning update

2010-12-04T21:59:09Z

Not too happy with Multi-Flaw value progression: mentioning update

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:59, 4 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Not too happy with Multi-Flaw value progression ==		== Not too happy with Multi-Flaw value progression ==
	I've now added the actual generic values for Flaws and Multi-Flaws, based on breadth, but I think perhaps the progression for Multi-Flaws is too similar to the one for normal Flaws. Multi-Flaws should probably start at a higher initial value for 2d, and then progress less aggressively. Expect this to be implemented. Also almost all the Simple Flaws I've written up are Typical in breadth; I think one is Narrow, and half a dozen (out of almost 40) are Broad or Very Broad. The full range of the Breadth spectrum will only be used with Complex Flaws, those that take various subjects, e.g. a Phobia for a common phenomena could be Very Broad, and a Phobia for a rare phenomena could be Very Narrow. (I also need to explain what Simple and Complex Flaws are, in the main article on Flaws.) --[[User:Peter Knutsen\|Peter Knutsen (the Designer)]] 09:47, 3 December 2010 (UTC)		I've now added the actual generic values for Flaws and Multi-Flaws, based on breadth, but I think perhaps the progression for Multi-Flaws is too similar to the one for normal Flaws. Multi-Flaws should probably start at a higher initial value for 2d, and then progress less aggressively. Expect this to be implemented. Also almost all the Simple Flaws I've written up are Typical in breadth; I think one is Narrow, and half a dozen (out of almost 40) are Broad or Very Broad. The full range of the Breadth spectrum will only be used with Complex Flaws, those that take various subjects, e.g. a Phobia for a common phenomena could be Very Broad, and a Phobia for a rare phenomena could be Very Narrow. (I also need to explain what Simple and Complex Flaws are, in the main article on Flaws.) --[[User:Peter Knutsen\|Peter Knutsen (the Designer)]] 09:47, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
		+	:I've changed the Flaw Point values for Multi-Flaws, in accordance with the above. --[[User:Peter Knutsen\|Peter Knutsen (the Designer)]] 21:59, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
		+
	== Moved article from Flaw Selection ==		== Moved article from Flaw Selection ==
	I decided to move this article from Flaw Selection to this new name, Simple Flaws, so that I can have separate articles for Phobias and for other Complex Flaws. --[[User:Peter Knutsen\|Peter Knutsen (the Designer)]] 13:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)		I decided to move this article from Flaw Selection to this new name, Simple Flaws, so that I can have separate articles for Phobias and for other Complex Flaws. --[[User:Peter Knutsen\|Peter Knutsen (the Designer)]] 13:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Peter Knutsen: explaining the move

2010-12-03T13:18:26Z

explaining the move

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:18, 3 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Not too happy with Multi-Flaw value progression ==		== Not too happy with Multi-Flaw value progression ==
	I've now added the actual generic values for Flaws and Multi-Flaws, based on breadth, but I think perhaps the progression for Multi-Flaws is too similar to the one for normal Flaws. Multi-Flaws should probably start at a higher initial value for 2d, and then progress less aggressively. Expect this to be implemented. Also almost all the Simple Flaws I've written up are Typical in breadth; I think one is Narrow, and half a dozen (out of almost 40) are Broad or Very Broad. The full range of the Breadth spectrum will only be used with Complex Flaws, those that take various subjects, e.g. a Phobia for a common phenomena could be Very Broad, and a Phobia for a rare phenomena could be Very Narrow. (I also need to explain what Simple and Complex Flaws are, in the main article on Flaws.) --[[User:Peter Knutsen\|Peter Knutsen (the Designer)]] 09:47, 3 December 2010 (UTC)		I've now added the actual generic values for Flaws and Multi-Flaws, based on breadth, but I think perhaps the progression for Multi-Flaws is too similar to the one for normal Flaws. Multi-Flaws should probably start at a higher initial value for 2d, and then progress less aggressively. Expect this to be implemented. Also almost all the Simple Flaws I've written up are Typical in breadth; I think one is Narrow, and half a dozen (out of almost 40) are Broad or Very Broad. The full range of the Breadth spectrum will only be used with Complex Flaws, those that take various subjects, e.g. a Phobia for a common phenomena could be Very Broad, and a Phobia for a rare phenomena could be Very Narrow. (I also need to explain what Simple and Complex Flaws are, in the main article on Flaws.) --[[User:Peter Knutsen\|Peter Knutsen (the Designer)]] 09:47, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
		+	== Moved article from Flaw Selection ==
		+	I decided to move this article from Flaw Selection to this new name, Simple Flaws, so that I can have separate articles for Phobias and for other Complex Flaws. --[[User:Peter Knutsen\|Peter Knutsen (the Designer)]] 13:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Peter Knutsen: moved Talk:Flaw Selection to Talk:Simple Flaws: want to have multiple articles on Flaws. One for Simple Flaws, and probably one for Phobias and one for other Complex Flaws. May want sep. article for Multi-Flaws too but not sure.

2010-12-03T13:04:42Z

moved Talk:Flaw Selection to Talk:Simple Flaws: want to have multiple articles on Flaws. One for Simple Flaws, and probably one for Phobias and one for other Complex Flaws. May want sep. article for Multi-Flaws too but not sure.

← Older revision

Revision as of 13:04, 3 December 2010

Peter Knutsen: Talking on the talk page

2010-12-03T09:47:04Z

Talking on the talk page

New page

== Not too happy with Multi-Flaw value progression ==
I've now added the actual generic values for Flaws and Multi-Flaws, based on breadth, but I think perhaps the progression for Multi-Flaws is too similar to the one for normal Flaws. Multi-Flaws should probably start at a higher initial value for 2d, and then progress less aggressively. Expect this to be implemented. Also almost all the Simple Flaws I've written up are Typical in breadth; I think one is Narrow, and half a dozen (out of almost 40) are Broad or Very Broad. The full range of the Breadth spectrum will only be used with Complex Flaws, those that take various subjects, e.g. a Phobia for a common phenomena could be Very Broad, and a Phobia for a rare phenomena could be Very Narrow. (I also need to explain what Simple and Complex Flaws are, in the main article on Flaws.) --[[User:Peter Knutsen|Peter Knutsen (the Designer)]] 09:47, 3 December 2010 (UTC)