Category:NCart - Revision history

Peter Knutsen: Correcting what I suspect is a capiltaization error

Peter Knutsen — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:09:24 GMT

Correcting what I suspect is a capiltaization error

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:09, 8 October 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Often for articles in this category, it is the ''boring'' stuff that is missing. Cost tables (that take time to generate in a spreadsheet, and then type in manually), or elaborative sections, mini-FAQs or similar. At this stage, the typical reader gets a quite good idea about the intent behind the rules concept that is the subject of the article, and he may even achieve a great understanding of the subject in the case of some articles, but he will sit with unanswered questions (sometimes important ones, like point costs!).		Often for articles in this category, it is the ''boring'' stuff that is missing. Cost tables (that take time to generate in a spreadsheet, and then type in manually), or elaborative sections, mini-FAQs or similar. At this stage, the typical reader gets a quite good idea about the intent behind the rules concept that is the subject of the article, and he may even achieve a great understanding of the subject in the case of some articles, but he will sit with unanswered questions (sometimes important ones, like point costs!).

-	The category level above this one is "[[:Category:Complete ~~Article~~\|Complete ~~Article~~]]", and the category level beneath this one is "[[:Category:ICart\|ICart]]", which stands for Incomplete Article.	+	The category level above this one is "[[:Category:Complete article\|Complete article]]", and the category level beneath this one is "[[:Category:ICart\|ICart]]", which stands for Incomplete Article.

	[[Category:Article completion]]		[[Category:Article completion]]

Peter Knutsen: Adding hyperlinked references to lower and higher level of completion

Peter Knutsen — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:08:42 GMT

Adding hyperlinked references to lower and higher level of completion

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:08, 8 October 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Often for articles in this category, it is the ''boring'' stuff that is missing. Cost tables (that take time to generate in a spreadsheet, and then type in manually), or elaborative sections, mini-FAQs or similar. At this stage, the typical reader gets a quite good idea about the intent behind the rules concept that is the subject of the article, and he may even achieve a great understanding of the subject in the case of some articles, but he will sit with unanswered questions (sometimes important ones, like point costs!).		Often for articles in this category, it is the ''boring'' stuff that is missing. Cost tables (that take time to generate in a spreadsheet, and then type in manually), or elaborative sections, mini-FAQs or similar. At this stage, the typical reader gets a quite good idea about the intent behind the rules concept that is the subject of the article, and he may even achieve a great understanding of the subject in the case of some articles, but he will sit with unanswered questions (sometimes important ones, like point costs!).
		+
		+	The category level above this one is "[[:Category:Complete Article\|Complete Article]]", and the category level beneath this one is "[[:Category:ICart\|ICart]]", which stands for Incomplete Article.

	[[Category:Article completion]]		[[Category:Article completion]]

Peter Knutsen: Adding category

Peter Knutsen — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 11:58:10 GMT

Adding category

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:58, 8 October 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Often for articles in this category, it is the ''boring'' stuff that is missing. Cost tables (that take time to generate in a spreadsheet, and then type in manually), or elaborative sections, mini-FAQs or similar. At this stage, the typical reader gets a quite good idea about the intent behind the rules concept that is the subject of the article, and he may even achieve a great understanding of the subject in the case of some articles, but he will sit with unanswered questions (sometimes important ones, like point costs!).		Often for articles in this category, it is the ''boring'' stuff that is missing. Cost tables (that take time to generate in a spreadsheet, and then type in manually), or elaborative sections, mini-FAQs or similar. At this stage, the typical reader gets a quite good idea about the intent behind the rules concept that is the subject of the article, and he may even achieve a great understanding of the subject in the case of some articles, but he will sit with unanswered questions (sometimes important ones, like point costs!).
		+
		+	[[Category:Article completion]]

Peter Knutsen: Creating the category

Peter Knutsen — Tue, 05 Oct 2010 05:29:11 GMT

Creating the category

New page

'''Near Complete Article'''

This category is to be used for articles that are close to completion. Articles where perhaps only 5% to 25% more content needs to be added before they can be thought of as complete, thorough and comprehensive.

Often for articles in this category, it is the ''boring'' stuff that is missing. Cost tables (that take time to generate in a spreadsheet, and then type in manually), or elaborative sections, mini-FAQs or similar. At this stage, the typical reader gets a quite good idea about the intent behind the rules concept that is the subject of the article, and he may even achieve a great understanding of the subject in the case of some articles, but he will sit with unanswered questions (sometimes important ones, like point costs!).