Talk:Simple Flaws
From Sagataflwiki
(Talking on the talk page) |
(→Not too happy with Multi-Flaw value progression: mentioning update) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Not too happy with Multi-Flaw value progression == | == Not too happy with Multi-Flaw value progression == | ||
I've now added the actual generic values for Flaws and Multi-Flaws, based on breadth, but I think perhaps the progression for Multi-Flaws is too similar to the one for normal Flaws. Multi-Flaws should probably start at a higher initial value for 2d, and then progress less aggressively. Expect this to be implemented. Also almost all the Simple Flaws I've written up are Typical in breadth; I think one is Narrow, and half a dozen (out of almost 40) are Broad or Very Broad. The full range of the Breadth spectrum will only be used with Complex Flaws, those that take various subjects, e.g. a Phobia for a common phenomena could be Very Broad, and a Phobia for a rare phenomena could be Very Narrow. (I also need to explain what Simple and Complex Flaws are, in the main article on Flaws.) --[[User:Peter Knutsen|Peter Knutsen (the Designer)]] 09:47, 3 December 2010 (UTC) | I've now added the actual generic values for Flaws and Multi-Flaws, based on breadth, but I think perhaps the progression for Multi-Flaws is too similar to the one for normal Flaws. Multi-Flaws should probably start at a higher initial value for 2d, and then progress less aggressively. Expect this to be implemented. Also almost all the Simple Flaws I've written up are Typical in breadth; I think one is Narrow, and half a dozen (out of almost 40) are Broad or Very Broad. The full range of the Breadth spectrum will only be used with Complex Flaws, those that take various subjects, e.g. a Phobia for a common phenomena could be Very Broad, and a Phobia for a rare phenomena could be Very Narrow. (I also need to explain what Simple and Complex Flaws are, in the main article on Flaws.) --[[User:Peter Knutsen|Peter Knutsen (the Designer)]] 09:47, 3 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I've changed the Flaw Point values for Multi-Flaws, in accordance with the above. --[[User:Peter Knutsen|Peter Knutsen (the Designer)]] 21:59, 4 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Moved article from Flaw Selection == | ||
| + | I decided to move this article from Flaw Selection to this new name, Simple Flaws, so that I can have separate articles for Phobias and for other Complex Flaws. --[[User:Peter Knutsen|Peter Knutsen (the Designer)]] 13:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:59, 4 December 2010
Not too happy with Multi-Flaw value progression
I've now added the actual generic values for Flaws and Multi-Flaws, based on breadth, but I think perhaps the progression for Multi-Flaws is too similar to the one for normal Flaws. Multi-Flaws should probably start at a higher initial value for 2d, and then progress less aggressively. Expect this to be implemented. Also almost all the Simple Flaws I've written up are Typical in breadth; I think one is Narrow, and half a dozen (out of almost 40) are Broad or Very Broad. The full range of the Breadth spectrum will only be used with Complex Flaws, those that take various subjects, e.g. a Phobia for a common phenomena could be Very Broad, and a Phobia for a rare phenomena could be Very Narrow. (I also need to explain what Simple and Complex Flaws are, in the main article on Flaws.) --Peter Knutsen (the Designer) 09:47, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- I've changed the Flaw Point values for Multi-Flaws, in accordance with the above. --Peter Knutsen (the Designer) 21:59, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Moved article from Flaw Selection
I decided to move this article from Flaw Selection to this new name, Simple Flaws, so that I can have separate articles for Phobias and for other Complex Flaws. --Peter Knutsen (the Designer) 13:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
