Talk:Profstat
From Sagataflwiki
(Writing on talk page.) |
(Expressing my feeling of being bold) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Yo, this is new content that I have not been able to talk about on the mailing list, due to computer problems. I'll try to remember to write about it once I get the change, but basically Profstat ties in with Omniskill which I'm pretty sure I've never mentioned before (it's a very new idea), and with Profession skills, which I may have talked briefly about before, or perhaps at least alluded to, but never as something that I felt was thought through sufficiently for it to be good to include (which I do think it is now).--[[User:Peter Knutsen|Peter Knutsen (the Designer)]] 23:13, 15 November 2010 (UTC) | Yo, this is new content that I have not been able to talk about on the mailing list, due to computer problems. I'll try to remember to write about it once I get the change, but basically Profstat ties in with Omniskill which I'm pretty sure I've never mentioned before (it's a very new idea), and with Profession skills, which I may have talked briefly about before, or perhaps at least alluded to, but never as something that I felt was thought through sufficiently for it to be good to include (which I do think it is now).--[[User:Peter Knutsen|Peter Knutsen (the Designer)]] 23:13, 15 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think this article warrants the complete tag. I can't think of anything hat needs added to it right now. It basically says everything it needs to say, should say, or could say. I'm feeling bold.--[[User:Peter Knutsen|Peter Knutsen (the Designer)]] 23:16, 15 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:16, 15 November 2010
Yo, this is new content that I have not been able to talk about on the mailing list, due to computer problems. I'll try to remember to write about it once I get the change, but basically Profstat ties in with Omniskill which I'm pretty sure I've never mentioned before (it's a very new idea), and with Profession skills, which I may have talked briefly about before, or perhaps at least alluded to, but never as something that I felt was thought through sufficiently for it to be good to include (which I do think it is now).--Peter Knutsen (the Designer) 23:13, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
I think this article warrants the complete tag. I can't think of anything hat needs added to it right now. It basically says everything it needs to say, should say, or could say. I'm feeling bold.--Peter Knutsen (the Designer) 23:16, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
